Thermoluminescence dating of brazilian indigenous ceramics Totally free sex personals sex chat
Betty Meggers received her Ph D in 1952, at which time women were candidates for a mere 10 percent of the doctoral degrees awarded in the United States.Evans and Meggers married in 1946, and went on to become two of the most influential archeologists of the twentieth century.Native American archaeological sites were of particular interest, including a visit to the Serpent Mound in Ohio when Betty was child.Betty’s first association with the Smithsonian occurred when, as the age of sixteen, she volunteered with the Department of Anthropology to mend pots excavated from the Anasazi village of Pueblo Bonito in New Mexico.During the last three decades over a dozen references concerning re-use of small Olmec artifacts in the Classical (III-IX centuries A. D.) contexts have been published, which give sufficient credibility to the appearance of a piece from the II-III century A. I have checked with people who knew García Payón and some who knew Moedano, and I have been unable to confirm or reject this suggestion.Hristov and Genovés neglect to mention Paddock's ideas in their article.” Actually this situation has been addressed thoughtfully in Hristov and Genovés (2001), as well in a paper read at April 22, 2001 during the 66th Annual Meeting of the Society of American Archaeology in New Orleans, Louisiana. Smith was present at the reading of the paper in the SAA meeting, and he also cites Hristov and Genovés’ article in his web page. Meggers published her first scientific paper, entitled “The Beal-Steere Collection of Pottery from Marajó Island, Brazil,” in 1945.
Betty later pursued a master’s degree at the University of Michigan, focusing her studies on pottery and ceramics collected from Marajó Island in 1870, and producing the aforementioned 1945 publication.D.], exactly in the ‘fashion’ of the epoch." (Andreae cited in Domenici 2000: 29). Especially suggestive in this respect is the discovery of a small Olmec mask from the early first millennia B. Smith, a professor of archaeology in the Arizona State University: The first one is that “… This could be a Roman figurine, but it was planted at the site, or in the laboratory, by a student or colleague of the excavator. John Paddock, a leading Mesoamerican scholar, used to tell classes at the Universidad de las Américas that the object was planted as a joke by Hugo Moedano, a student who worked at the site.On the other hand, an examination of the field notes of the archaeologist in charge of the excavation as well as the site itself have not revealed, in either case, signs of possible disturbances of the context (Hristov and Genovés 1999). Many archaeologists in Mexico have heard this story and they tend to believe it.With the only exception of the well-established Medieval Norse contacts with North American Indians (Mc Gee 1984) all of the mentioned hypotheses share a common critical weakness: the lack of support in direct archaeological evidence, that is, genuine Old Word objects found in Pre-Columbian archaeological contexts (Willey 1985: 358).During the XIX and XX centuries some more or less reliable finds of such objects were reported from Mesoamerica; however, until the present time none of them have been accepted as incontrovertible evidence of inter-hemispheric contact before 1492.